Archive for the ‘pro life doctor’ Category
Posted by Job on March 12, 2008
Posted by Job on February 8, 2008
Note: for background see
Italian Doctors: Abortion Survivors must be given Care, Even Against Mother’s Wishes
by Matthew Cullinan Hoffman : Feb 7, 2008 : LifeSiteNews
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2008/feb/08020601.htmlThe declaration “has fallen like a bomb among scientists and politicans.”
18 week Preborn Baby(Rome)—Doctors from four different Roman universities have issued a joint declaration affirming the duty of doctors to rescue and care for infants born alive after an abortion attempt, even against the wishes of the mother. (Photo: Lifesite.net)
The declaration, made by doctors at the obstetric clinics of La Sapienza, Tor Vergata, Campus Biomedico and Sacro Cuore, represent both the secular and religious sides of the Italian university system. The first two universities are public, and the second two are Catholic.
“An extremely premature newborn must be treated like any other person in danger, and assisted adequately,” said Domenico Arduni, director of the Tor Vergata gynecological clinic.
Arduini added that this principle would hold even if the child had survived an abortion, and “even if the mother is not in agreement.”
The four physicians issued the statement together during a meeting at Fatebenefratelli hospital in Rome last Saturday. According to the Spanish publication El Pais, the doctors’ declaration and the Vatican’s recent campaign for a “moratorium” on abortion in Italy (which has now become a global campaign), “has fallen like a bomb among scientists and politicians.”
Emma Bonino, the Italian Minister of European Policy, complained to El Pais that “the political class should not allow others to set their agenda.” The Italian health minister, Livia Turco, told the publication that protecting the life of such children was “senseless cruelty.” A prominent physician reportedly suggested that abortions be done by poisoning the baby with potassium chloride, thus ensuring his death before exiting the womb.
However, the ANSA news agency reports that the liberal bioethicist Cinzia Caporale has endorsed the physicians’ declaration, stating that while she is in favor of allowing euthanasia for adults who want it, children who leave the womb alive should be cared for, even against the will of the parents. “I don’t even consider their consent necessary if the fetus has survived an abortion,” she said.
Powered by ScribeFire.
Posted in abortion, abortion rights, christian conservative, Christian Zionism, Christianity, church hypocrisy, church state, dual covenant theology, feminism, innocent blood, media conspiracy, murder, oneness pentecostal, Pat Robertson, poverty, pro choice, pro life, pro life doctor, rape, Ron Paul, Russia, stem cells, televangelism, thou shalt not murder, Why America Is A World Leader In Murders | Tagged: thou | 4 Comments »
Posted by Job on January 14, 2008
Original link: The Third Deadly Sin
In Defense of the Faith
Saturday, January 12, 2008
Jack Kinsella – Omega Letter Editor
the children struggled together within her; and she said, If it be so,
why am I thus? And she went to inquire of the LORD. And the LORD said
unto her, Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall
be separated from thy bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than
the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger.” (Genesis
This story is, of course, the story of Jacob
and Esau, the twin sons of Isaac, the younger son of Abraham. Let’s
examine a few more of the details of their birth before moving on.
when her days to be delivered were fulfilled, behold, there were twins
in her womb. And the first came out red, all over like an hairy
garment; and they called his name Esau.”
“And after that came his
brother out, and his hand took hold on Esau’s heel; and his name was
called Jacob: and Isaac was threescore years old when she bare them.”
Note three things right away. In the first, the Scripture calls them children rather than “masses of unfeeling protoplasm.”
Lord Himself told Rebekah that in her womb were two people — not
incipient people, or potential people, but were already people with a
Divinely predetermined destiny.
Third, the two sons of Isaac were already locked in combat while still in the womb.
Then there is the testimony of Job to consider:
this opened Job his mouth and cursed his day. . . . Let the day perish
wherein I was born, and the night in which it was said, There is a man
child conceived.” (Job 3:1,3)
So, when does a fetus become a person? Job, according to Scripture, was a ‘man-child’ at conception.
in the same verse, Job laments that he had not been still-born, saying:
“Or as an hidden untimely birth I had not been; as infants which never
saw light.” (Job 3:16)
Note here that the Scriptures refer to
what is currently classified as non-life as an ‘infant’. (An ‘infant’
what? Aardvaark? Puppy? Tree toad? Is this hard?)
In regard to
the first human beings, Genesis tells us that “Adam called his wife’s
name Eve; because she was the mother of all living.” (Genesis 3:20)
leaves little room for any interpretation that suggests that an
in-vitro baby is somehow not separate and distinct from the mother’s
Or that there is a point it a baby’s existence when it is not ‘living’.
So the claim that “a woman’s right to do what she pleases with her own body” is exposed as a lie.
what it really espouses is a woman’s right to do what she pleases with
another person’s body, up to the moment that other person can draw his
or her first unassisted breath.
“I was cast upon thee from the womb: thou art my God from my mother’s belly.” (Pslams 22:10)
“Thus saith the LORD, thy Redeemer, and He that formed thee from the womb. . .”
the most undeniable example of the personhood of the unborn: “For, lo,
as soon as the voice of thy salutation sounded in mine ears, the babe
leaped in my womb for joy.” (Luke 1:44)
This passage notes the
pre-birth meeting of John the Baptist and Jesus Christ whilst both were
still allegedly ‘unfeeling masses of protoplasm.’
Scriptures, that which has been conceived and lives in the mother’s
womb from conception on is referred to by God as a “child,” a “son,” an
“infant,” a “baby,” a “man-child,” etc. The woman in whose womb it
lives is a “mother.”
No human being anywhere in the Bible is
identified by terms that are more distinctly human than these terms.
God makes no distinction between born and unborn life. The Lord uses
exactly the same terms for both.
Let’s take a brief look at the main reasons given for having abortions and see how they fare under the clear light of day.
1) Babies conceived out of wedlock
2) Parents incapable of caring for the baby.
3) Baby will have an inferior quality of life
4) The child is a product of rape.
Logically, if any of those reasons are valid reasons for abortion before birth, why are they not equally valid after birth?
And if they are not valid after birth, then logic dictates they are equally invalid reasons beforehand.
yourself to be astonished with me. I read on Sunday of a campaign
mailer going out on behalf of the Clinton campaign criticizing Barak
Obama’s record on abortion.
First, some background, so I am not
misunderstood here. During his legislative career, Barak Obama has
received a 100% rating from the Illinois Planned Parenthood Council for
his support of abortion ‘rights’ issues.
So Obama is not some
closet ‘right-to-lifer’ — which is the impression the mailing is
designed to create. Indeed, Obama voted against a measure that would
require medical care for babies who survive an abortion attempt.
about that for a second, (if you can do so without bursting into
tears.) Obama is as much a supporter of in-vitro murder as Hillary or
any of her political challengers are, but Hillary doesn’t think so.
woman’s right to choose,” the mailing says on the front, then flips to
the back, “demands a leader who will stand up and protect it.”
mailing boasts that Hillary has a record of fighting “far-right
Republicans” to defend abortion rights, while Obama has been “unwilling
to take a stand on choice.”
“Seven times he had the opportunity
to stand up against Republican anti-choice legislation in the Illinois
state Senate,” it says. “Seven times he voted present – not yes or no,
but present. Being there is not enough to protect choice.”
The “choice” involved, I hasten to remind you, is a woman’s right to choose to kill her own baby.
to a Democrat, being charged with opposing the murder of the unborn is
classified as a “negative attack ad” — and that is exactly the way the
Barak campaign characterized it — as if, if true, it would somehow be
a badge of dishonor.
Obama spokesman Bill Burton responded, “The
Clinton campaign’s false negative attacks were rejected by Iowa voters,
and we expect that they’ll suffer the same fate here in New Hampshire.”
in some deep, visceral way, this numbs the mind, even though
championing abortion has been the bedrock issue of Democrats since the
There is something about opposing medical care to an abortion survivor not being pro-death enough that screams out at me.
turning one’s back on a helpless, dying human being isn’t pro-abortion
enough for the Democrats, then we need a new word to describe ‘red-meat
Psalms 106 is essentially a retelling of the history
of the Israelite people from bondage in Egypt and their resettlement in
the Land of Canaan, where, the Psalmist lamented, they disobeyed God’s
command to destroy the land’s current inhabitants.
“They did not
destroy the nations, concerning whom the LORD commanded them: But were
mingled among the heathen, and learned their works.” (Psalms 106:34-35).
‘works’ did they learn? The Psalmist charged them with, “shed[ding]
innocent blood, even the blood of their sons and of their daughters,
whom they sacrificed unto the idols of Canaan: and the land was
polluted with blood.” (Psalms 106:38)
For this offense, God
exacted judgment in the form of Israel’s destruction, the subsequent
destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple, and the loss of Jewish
national sovereignty that lasted two and a half millennia — from the
Babylonian Conquest until the restoration of Israel as an independent
sovereign state on May 14, 1948.
By conservative estimates,
Americans have shed the blood of more than 25 million (25,000,000) of
their own sons and daughters since Roe v. Wade became the law of the
Indeed, the willingness to approve, and even participate
legislatively in the blood-letting is considered a political plus among
almost half of Americans — if Hillary Clinton is to be believed. And
this is one of the few times I believe her.
I find it interesting that Hillary chose to highlight ‘seven’ chinks in Obama’s baby-killing armor.
God has a seven point list He keeps, as well.
six things doth the LORD hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto Him:
A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood, An
heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running
to mischief, A false witness that speaketh lies, and he that soweth
discord among brethren.” (Proverbs 6:16-18)
That leaves us with
two questions to ponder. The first is, “which of these is NOT a major
plank in the Campaign 2008 platform?” The second is, “Where is America
in Bible Prophecy?”
I don’t like either of the answers I came up with. What about you?
The Omega Letter Daily Intelligence Digest, Volume 76, Issue 7
Powered by ScribeFire.
Posted by Job on November 6, 2007
Posted by Job on November 6, 2007
Source link here:
“My professor was permitting abortions to defy the law, I accidently walked into the room where they were doing an abortion and they delivered a 2 lb infant that was breathing and crying, and they put the baby in a basket in the corner and pretended they didn’t hear it cry and let it die.”
— Ron Paul and why he’s against abortion.
How’s that going to sound in Ron Paul’s voice on the radio and on television when he starts to spend some of that $4.2 million?
Posted in abortion, abortion rights, Christianity, GOP, politics, pro choice, pro life, pro life doctor, Republican, Ron Paul | Tagged: antiabortion, federalism, gynecologist, libertarian, obstetrician | 2 Comments »
Jesus Christ To The Religious Left: Why Do You Call Me Lord Lord And Do Not Do What I Say? Luke 6:46
Posted by Job on June 15, 2007
Please click www.liveprayer.com/signup.htm to sign up to receive this devotional in your email. *Personal note: This is one of the times when Pastor Keller’s views do not line up with my own, but Keller is still a Bible – based preacher so there is nothing wrong with providing this devotional.
“Why do you call me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ and do not do what I say?” Luke 6:46
The “religious left.” In case you have been sleeping, there is a new group
of people in our nation who call themselves the “religious left.” This is a relatively new term so you may not be familiar with it. That is why I felt it was so critical to take the time today to insure you not only understood what it means, but who actually makes up this new group of people. Forty years ago, this group didn’t even exist. They have actually evolved and
grown tremendously over the past decade.
The “religious left” is made up of people who identify themselves as
Christians and hold strong religious beliefs as well as sharing left-wing
ideals. Obviously, this group has risen up in opposition to those who have
been tagged the “religious right” or the “Christian right.” The “Christian
right” is that group of Bible-believing Christians who are politically
active and seek to elect to office those candidates who hold to Biblical
values on the key spiritual issues of our day that are also political
These would be issues like abortion and life related matters, gay marriage,
family issues, the proliferation of the pornography industry, and the drive
to remove God from the public square. Those in the “religious left”
actually take an anti-Biblical position on these issues and are also heavily
involved in the ecumenical movement, environmental issues, opposing war for
any reason, world hunger, and social issues like healthcare, welfare, and
There is nothing wrong with pursing these noble social issues, Believers
should be more involved on those fronts. The problem with this group is
their anti-Biblical position on the key spiritual issues of our day and
their involvement in these ecumenical movements that require you to set
aside the Absolute Truths of the Bible.
I watched with interest a last week as CNN carried a special program about
faith with the leading Democratic Candidates who are vying for their parties
nomination in the 2008 Presidential election. Each one dealt with various
faith-related issues in the context of their own personal faith. I watched
in amazement as each one talked about how important their faith was to them,
how it guided them, how it gave them strength, and went out of their way to
position themselves as people of great faith.
Like my dear mother used to tell me, talk is cheap. I refuse to try and
judge their heart, that is something only God can and will do. However, I
have every right to judge them on their actions in accordance with God’s
Word. How can you say you are a person of faith, yet vote to support the
legalized slaughter of over 4,000 innocent babies every day? How can you
say you are a person of faith, yet vote to redefine God’s Holy Institution
of Marriage? How can you say you are a person of faith, yet support special
rights for people who have chosen to engage in perverted sex acts God calls
an abomination, including their ability to adopt children into their deviant
I guess the real question becomes, what is their faith really in? It is
inconsistent to say you are person of faith yet continually take a stand in
complete opposition to God’s Word. Jesus said that if you love Me, you will
obey Me. That means His Word. Of course, those in the “religious left” has
been born out of the liberal “churches” of our day who make a mockery of
Christ as they operate in open rebellion to the Truth of the Bible while
claiming to be followers of Christ.
They support the legalized slaughter of babies, redefining marriage to
include men with men and women with women, perverting the family by brining
children into homes with homosexual parents, and embrace ecumenical
fellowships with all of the cults and false religions of the world. They
deny the inspiration and inerrancy of the Bible, have rejected God’s Word
for the Absolute Truth it represents, and have bought into the lie of the
world that there are “many roads that lead to God.” These are the people
who make up the “religious left!”
I love you and care about you so much. It is beyond me how a person can
consider themselves a Christian, which means they are a follower of Christ
and automatically a follower of His Word, yet take a public position in
complete opposition to that Word. You better wake up, since this is the
largest growing segment of Christendom, this apostate group who calls
themselves Christians but go to churches who operate in complete rebellion
to Christ and the Bible
This is the group that is Biblically illiterate since they don’t even
believe the Bible to be true. These are the people who see nothing wrong
with electing a member of a satanic cult to the White House because they
think a Mormon is a Christian. They are the politically correct crowd who
has bought the lie a woman has the right to kill her baby. They are the
group who lambastes those who speak out against the sin of homosexuality,
calling them names like “intolerant” and “hateful.”
The “religious left” is a group who will wield incredible political
influence in the upcoming 2008 election. They are mostly made up of people
who call themselves Christians, but support the things Christ and the Bible
condemn. Pray for these people since you can’t call yourself a follower of
Christ, yet stand on the opposite side of Christ on so many issues. Truth
is not what we want it to be, it is what God says it is. We don’t have the
luxury of giving our heart and life to Christ and then live any way we want.
A true follower of Christ is a follower of His Word. Jesus said, “Why do
you call me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ and do not do what I say?”
In His love and service,
Your friend and brother in Christ,
If I can help you in any way you can contact me through my personal email at:
***ARE YOU 100% CERTAIN WHERE YOU WILL SPEND ETERNITY? The fact is you will
die one day. At that moment, you will either spend eternity with the Lord or
be cast into everlasting darkness forever separated from God your creator.
To know for certain you will be forever with Jesus, go to:
***I am excited to let you know that the Liveprayer Daily Devotional is now
available via AUDIO each day. Simply go to http://www.liveprayer.com/Audio.cfm
Also, you can now listen to the Daily Devotional by phone by calling,
***LEGAL UPDATE! Please be praying this week as our attorneys will be in
Federal Court to seek injunctive relief against Microsoft for blocking our
Daily Devotionals from our subscribers with Microsoft email accounts based
on the “content” of what I write each day. Censoring mail under the guise
of blocking SPAM is becoming a big problem. Pray that we find favor from
the judge and those who will be involved. <<<IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE YOUR
DAILY DEVOTIONAL ON A GIVEN DAY, REMEMBER IT IS POSTED ON THE
WWW.LIVEPRAYER.COM WEBSITE EACH DAY.>>> (C) Copyright 2007, Bill Keller Ministries. All rights reserved.
Posted in abomination, abortion, abortion rights, anti - Semitism, Apologetics, baptismal regeneration, Bill Clinton, CAIR, christian left, christian liberalism, Christianity, church hypocrisy, church state, civil rights, conservatism, conservative Christian, devotional, Egypt, eschatology, false doctrine, false preacher, false preachers, false prophet, false religion, false teachers, false teaching, gay marriage, gay rights, George Bush, government dependency, Hillary Clinton, homophobia, homosexuality, humanism, identity politics, illegal immigration, immigration, innocent blood, Jehovah's witnesses, legalism, liberal, liberal christian, liberalism, liberation theology, Middle East peace process, mohammed, Moshiach, nigeria, Pat Robertson, political correctness, politics, pornography, post - tribulation rapture, post abortion syndrome, pro choice, pro life, pro life doctor, public education, religious left, Republican, Russia, secular humanism, sexual exploitation, somalia, spiritual deliverance techniques, spiritual warfare, syncretism, Tim LaHaye, Yeshua Hamashiach, Zola Leavitt | 7 Comments »
Posted by Job on April 21, 2007
Now people, the reason why God destroyed the earth with the flood and why He sent Israel into Babylonian captivity was the shedding of innocent blood. Abortion is the shedding of innocent blood, and God is going to judge all who take a part in it without repenting of it, and that does not just include people, but also nations who allow it to be legal. What I am about to share with you is incontrovertible proof that abortion is murder. It has nothing to do with women’s rights. It has nothing to do with sexual freedom. It has nothing to do with women’s health. It has nothing to do with religion or values. Abortion is plain and simple cold blooded murder just like shooting someone in the heart, cutting someone’s throat, or a corporation dumping toxic waste into a drinking water supply. What is my proof? This link (whose text is cut and pasted in italics at the bottom of this entry), which says that a study was done on a certain type of abortion in a certain region of Britain, AND BABIES SURVIVED 109 OF THE 3189 ABORTIONS! BUT THESE BABIES SOON DIED AFTERWARDS BECAUSE WHEN A BABY SURVIVES AN ABORTION, THEY DENY THE CHILD MEDICAL CARE SO THAT THEY CAN CLASSIFY IT AS A LIVE BIRTH AND NEONATAL DEATH! SO PEOPLE, THIS IS WHAT GOES ON IN OUR ABORTION CLINICS! BABIES ARE BORN, FIGHT FOR THEIR LIVES, BUT ARE LEFT TO DIE! THE SOLE DETERMINATION OF WHETHER THE “DOCTORS” AND “NURSES” ATTEMPT TO SAVE THE BABY AFTER IT IS BORN IS WHETHER THE MOTHER WANTS IT TO LIVE!
You know, I have heard rumors about this before. The creators of South Park actually created a political satire mocking George W. Bush whose pilot episode featured an anti-abortion activist that had survived his own abortion and never physically developed past the fetal stage. So, this is obviously known to the medical community. But you know what? They keep it secret. Why? Because if the truth got out about how “DOCTORS” are letting newborns DIE while MAKING NO ATTEMPT TO SAVE THEM, there would be a huge revolt both against abortion AND the medical profession. See, the whole abortion thing is based on “if it is in the mother’s body, it belongs to the mother, so she can dispose of it if she wants.” But once the baby is outside of the mother and its heart is beating and is breathing, it is a legal living distinct entity. It is the job of the medical profession to do all that they can to save the child’s life. Now under any other circumstances, a doctor who would just allow an infant to struggle for life while slowly dying would be subject to criminal and civil prosecution, have his license revoked, and be the subject of professional and public shame. But for an abortion “doctor”, it is just part of doing business. Now if this happens during 3.2% of all abortion procedures, it is save to say that a great percentage of abortion “doctors” who perform this type of procedure have had to allow a baby to die. So, pro – choice people, what do you say about these “doctors” now? I say that they are obviously killers. What do you?
The paper has been released following a 10-year analysis of abortions for foetal anomaly in the West Midlands of Britain. The results of the research show that live births occurred in a shocking 18 out of 20 maternity units in the West Midlands. Julia Millington of the Alive and Kicking Campaign said: “Yet again we are confronted with the gruesome reality that babies are fighting for their lives as doctors try to abort them. The increasingly widespread practice of abortion for disability reflects very poorly on a society that prides itself on equal rights for people with disabilities.” She added: “But this paper also begs the question, if 102 out of 3,189 babies aborted for reasons of impairment are born alive, then how many healthy babies must be surviving?” Earlier this month experts warned of an imminent crisis in the NHS as increasing numbers of doctors refuse to carry out abortions.
According to the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, there has been a big rise in the number of doctors who are “conscientious objectors”. About 190,000 abortions take place in England and Wales annually. Abortion is legal in Britain up to 24 weeks, however it can occur later if doctors believe the baby has a severe disability or if the mother’s life is at risk. Experts say the decline in the number of NHS doctors willing to perform abortions stems from their ability to “pick and choose” the areas they train and specialise in – and very few opt to carry out terminations when they can choose other areas such as fertility medicine. The latest research is likely to further enflame the debate on the ethical stance of Britain’s abortion laws. Millington from Alive & Kicking continued: “The survival instinct of these premature babies is very strong but without proper neonatal care they stand no chance at all. With live births after abortion occurring in 18 of the 20 maternity units in the West Midlands alone it is difficult to comprehend the number of babies, throughout the country, left fighting for their lives.” She concluded: “’These cases are recorded as live births and neonatal deaths, and the suggestion that the number of cases might be 2.4 times higher than those recorded in the national statistics means that our already alarming abortion rates are even higher than acknowledged.”
Posted in abortion, abortion rights, christian conservative, Christian Zionism, church hypocrisy, church state, dual covenant theology, feminism, innocent blood, media conspiracy, murder, oneness pentecostal, Pat Robertson, poverty, pro choice, pro life, pro life doctor, rape, Ron Paul, Russia, stem cells, televangelism, thou shalt not murder, Why America Is A World Leader In Murders | 1 Comment »
Posted by Job on April 18, 2007
Remember all of the propaganda from the abortion rights crowd claiming that “abortion is a decision between a woman and her doctor”, and claiming that it was a consensus view of the medical community that life began at birth? That it was a scientific matter, and that people who opposed abortion did so for religious and political reasons, or were simply trying to discriminate against women (making them vessels for the state and the church, as John Edwards’ blogger Amanda Marcotte claimed)? Well, it was all lies. First came this study proving that most American doctors oppose abortion. Now here is this story saying that BRITISH doctors (that’s right, liberal secular Britain) are refusing to perform abortions, so many that access to this procedure is being threatened (click here to read document). Now, the HUGE OPPOSITION to abortion in the medical community is known to the media and politicians, but they suppress it; refusing to report it and carrying lies instead. You NEVER see them interviewing DOCTORS who oppose abortion, DOCTORS who have seen unborn children playing and learning in vitro, only right wing white male Republicans from South Carolina. That is why they have to pass laws forcing pharmacists to give out RU – 486, and why feminists are lobbying medical schools to make it mandatory for all medical students to perform abortions. Why? To force people who oppose abortion OUT of the medical profession. Britain is now considering allowing NURSES to perform abortion. Which only PROVES that abortion is MURDER and NOT A MEDICAL PROCEDURE!
Posted by Job on February 14, 2007
This despite the American Medical Association, which is nothing more than a union and a political/ideological lobbying group, being militantly pro – infanticide and in full support of an abortion culture. Obviously, if 52% of doctors oppose abortion, the media must know that the rank and file opinion of doctors opposes the AMA, and that they just choose to cover it up in order to further their own anti – Christ agenda. Oh yes, and this study was scientific, done by the prestigious University of Chicago and not some pro – life group or other biased or marginal source. Read it and weep (or sweep it under the rug like you always do!) This does real damage to the notion that abortion was “a medical decision, and opposing abortion, which is a health issue, is a stand that endangers public health.” (Never mind that public health was going along just fine until abortion was legalized a mere 35 years or so ago.) This removes abortion from being a medical issue – indeed, it is now a negative, as there is substantial opposition to it in the medical community – and makes it a moral, religious, political and legal one.
Now the feticide supports have long known this; why else would they pass laws mandating that pharmacists must give out the abortion pill, and that people in medical and nursing school must perform abortions? To weed out all of the pro – life Christians, of course. And now, they are trying to keep Christians from studying science too.