Jesus Christ Is Lord

That every knee should bow and every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord to the glory of God the Father!

Roosevelt’s Refusal To Save Auschwitz Jews During World War II

Posted by Job on January 18, 2009

Please note the part about how Britain refused to allow Jewish refugees into Palestine during this time as well.


21 Responses to “Roosevelt’s Refusal To Save Auschwitz Jews During World War II”

  1. Hope said

    “Today, America again faces the challenge of responding to genocide. The Darfur genocide continues, yet the Arab League, China and Russia are trying to prevent the prosecution of Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir for his role in the slaughter. What will the United States do? Iranian leaders have threatened genocide against Israel, and Syria is developing nuclear weapons to go along with its other weapons of mass destruction. How should America respond? The Roosevelt administration had the opportunity to send the Tuskegee Airmen and other pilots to interrupt the Nazi genocide, but it chose not to do so. The Obama administration will face comparable moral challenges.”

    Job, I’ve got to give it to you, you sure provoke challenging thought and debate with your posts!!!

    America has stood with Isreal and boy, are we unpopular with many for THAT moral choice as evidenced on this blog!

    How should America respond to the Darfur genocide???

    First and foremeost PRAY for the Lord Jesus to intervene. Secondly, I honestly don’t know if as a country, America will be able to respond to this genocide. We are at war on two fronts (and hated by most of the world for it) and possibly facing financial collapse as a nation.

    How will the Obama admin face these comparable MORAL challenge???

    I don’t think he will intervene. I don’t think he will want to initiate another military conflict. He will most likely try diplomatic negotiations. Time will tell.

    I think President-elect Obama may develop a whole lot more respect and compassion for the enourmously difficult “moral” choices President Bush had to make on his watch.

    Sad, sad, sad…….Have mercy upon us Lord Jesus and deliver us from evil!

  2. Diane said

    The question shouldnt be “How is the United States going to respond to Darfur”, but should be “How is the WORLD going to deal with Darfur”.

    We accept other nations looking the other way while the Arab gunmen kill. What is Saudi Arabia going to do? Great Britian? Egypt? Iran? Spain? France?

  3. Hope said

    AMEN, Diane!

  4. Diane said

    Hi Hope.
    Thanks for the link Maggie’s Notebook!

  5. Job said


    America has declared itself to be the world’s moral, social, cultural, political, military, and economic leader. Not only that, but we are rather, shall I say, HOSTILE at times to those who refuse to fall in line and see the world the way that we do, or for that matter nations and groups that have the gall to look to their own agendas and best interests rather than act according to our own agenda and best interests. In other words, we Americans see no problem in telling other nations to make sacrifices on our behalf that we would never do for them and have no intention whatsoever of reciprocating, and we are quick to call them “anti – American”, “anti – western” and take diplomatic, economic, political, military etc. actions against them because of it.

    The other countries of the world do not attempt to be the world leaders (or the world police), and they certainly do not seek to punish nations for being “anti – German”, “anti – French”, etc. The only nations that really seem to be trying to lead the rest of the world anywhere and get angry if some nation somewhere opposes them are America and Israel. All the other nations in the world are like “you hate my guts? Fine. I hate yours too. When our country meets yours on the soccer field during the World Cup, maybe we can settle our disputes then!”

    And since America does claim to be a force for peace, justice, human rights and democracy and especially uses those things as justifications for taking military action, then our failure to act in situations like Darfur makes us appear hypocritical. “Saudi Arabia going to do? Great Britian? Egypt? Iran? Spain? France?” … those nations didn’t fight wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Korea, Viet Nam etc. Those nations didn’t get involved in all these military, political, diplomatic intrigues in the Middle East, Asia, Africa, South America, etc. Those nations don’t have military bases all over the world.

    So we can’t just go back and forth between being the world police/world leaders and saying “this is a global problem that requires everyone else step up to the plate.” Spain, France, everyone else largely just tends to their own internal issues and tries to cooperate with its neighbors, and maybe on a very limited basis may taken an interest in any former colonies that they once held. (For instance, most European nations don’t even care about NATO anymore. For them, it is all about the EU.)

    So, there isn’t a bit of hypocrisy in “Saudi Arabia? Great Britian? Egypt? Iran? Spain? France?, THE WORLD” in failing to act in Darfur, because those nations don’t pretend to be out there trying to guarantee peace and democracy throughout the globe, and they certainly don’t have these global military/intelligence networks. All of those nations and everyone else will say “let the UN handle it” and for them it is consistent with the international policies that they have maintained since World War II.

    America would honestly be better off if it just stood up and admitted that we are in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Saudi Arabia (huge military base protecting the House of Saud) now and got involved in all of the other messes in Latin America, Africa, Asia, the Middle East etc. pursuing our own interests and not the interests of humanity, or even the interests of the people of the places that we were intervening (because yes, the United States did prop up some very cruel and brutal dictators and oppressive regimes). If we were to just come out and say “Hey, all that peace and freedom and justice stuff; that was all propaganda, we were really just out for ourselves all along … and hey to all the people we harmed, sold out, made promises to that we never had any intentions of living up to along the way … wow well we are really sorry, but even more so than being sorry we are REALLY GLAD that we are not in the shape that we left you behind in … oh well don’t sit around being victims, pull yourselves up by your own bootstraps, but don’t cross us or cut any deals with our enemies while you are pulling yourselves up, or we will crush you with sanctions and if that doesn’t teach you then hey, we will just carpet bomb you into submission and then put in a corrupt puppet regime in as your government and a huge military base in your backyard to make sure that this regime stays in power, at least until we lose interest in you and go somewhere else that we find interesting so you can descend into decades of civil war … but hey that’s issue not ours so have a nice life! Wish you were here! Or actually, not, we like it with our being over here and you being over there!”

    But it is because we have these altruistic pretensions that people keep asking us to do something about Darfur, about Rwanda, about the Palestinians (and the Israelis), about anyone and everyone who has a story of woe and grief to tell. If we were to be like the rest of the world and admit that we are just looking our for ourselves, then a lot of that would go away.

    But of course, if we did that, then we would just be trading one set of problems for another. Which is, of course, why we keep the altruism myth going. But as to the nations that see through our game and call us on it, well then I don’t blame them one bit.

    The nation that find that being “pro – American” or “pro – western” doesn’t put any food on its tables and won’t protect it should any other nation choose to invade and cuts a deal with Russia, China, Venezuela or another one of our enemies … you can call them anti – American if you choose, but I would call such a nation smart.

  6. Diane said

    Hello Job, I believe these other nations have just as much obligation as we do to address the Darfur crisis.

    Forgive me for going off topic:
    I just want to encourage everyone to please pray for the racism rising in our nation. Thank you

  7. The Prodigal Son said

    This article is a good introduction to the events of WWII as they REALLY occurred… because almost everything we (in North America) have been told about that time period (and before) has been a distortion or an outright LIE ! ~~~ ~~~ Churchill himself was a Jew ! … ~~~ ~~~ The truth is the International Zionist leaders of the day (or worldwide ‘Judea’ as they called themselves back then) could have easily saved ALL of the Jews that died in the camps by accepting them into England or North America… but the Zionists REFUSED to provide funds and means to transport Jews to any destination other than Palestine ! They actually said, “One cow in Palestine is worth more than all the Jews in Europe.” ! ~~~ These Zionists actually stated in negotiations that those Jews remaining in Europe would have to sacrifice & shed blood in order for Jews to justify sitting at the bargaining table at the end of the war (which they had started) ! … Churchill just did what he was told…

  8. The Prodigal Son said

    Diane… ~~~ This “racism rising” you speak of… are you talking about racism against the rich white folks who call themselves ‘Jews’, and are NOT… but DO lie ? Those of the synagogue of satan ? ~~~ ~~~ I think it would be more accurate to call this wildfire of TRUTH spreading what it is : *religious discrimination*. ~~~ However I do not discriminate… – If a ‘Jew’ will accept Christ and is NOT a liar, paedophile, rapist or murderer… then he is my brother. ~~~ However, as a Gentile I am a * victim * of racism… because these Ashkenazi elitists have declared themselves the Biblical chosen people of God (which is ludicrous because they themselves are clearly NOT at all semetic). Someone on another post asked me what relevance could the Talmud could have for us today… They STILL hold the Talmud as a higher authority than the Pentateuch (five books of Moses) of the O.T… THIS (Talmud) is the source of the racism you speak of, which is actually against all Gentiles of the world… of which I am one.

  9. Diane said

    Prodigal, you dont know what Im referring to.

  10. The Prodigal Son said

    Exactly ! Which is why I asked for clarification… specifically what racism DO you speak of ?

  11. Diane said

    Why dont you start by praying for the racism in your own heart.

  12. The Prodigal Son said

    Diane, ~~~ Why don’t you stop playing games ? How can you carry on a coherent correspondance with me if you ignore what I’ve JUST SAID to you ? ~~~ ~~~ I am NOT a racist ! I have had black, native, oriental and hispanic friends & acquaintences, never had one thing against any of them with regards to their race ! ~~~ How can I (being caucasian) be racist toward other caucasians ? Please, don’t be ridiculous with your statements ! ~~~ ~~~ As I have already said (and you have ignored)… this is about religion – NOT race !! This is about DEEDS and the Talmudic religious justification of lying to, stealing from and murder of non-Jews, as well as it’s matter-of-fact approval of pederasty – it is NOT about genetics… !

  13. The Prodigal Son said

    ~~~ P.S. – Eisenhower, Marx, Stalin, Churchill and of course Roosevelt were ALL of Jewish descent… just a coincidence, I guess ! ~~~

  14. Devon said

    Prodigal, that is nonsense and based on dubious sources…Churchill, Eisenhower, Stalin and Roosevelt were not Jewish….and even if any of them has some tiny amount of Jewish blood in them from long ago ancestors, that means nothing…this is absurd…

    The only one you are correct on is Marx…and even there, the family converter to Lutherism if I am not mistaken..but Marx by blood was a Jew….not that that should matter….

    What should matter is that he founded an evil ideology….which had nothing to do with him being jewish….

  15. The Prodigal Son said

    Devon (Moshe ?)… ~~~ You’re the dubious source on this thread ! … Jewish blood ?!? Do you even read my posts, or are you being purposely obtuse ? ~ *THEY HAVE NO HEBREW BLOOD !* ~ They only call themselves ‘Jews’. According to Israel’s right of return – if your mother was a Jew, then you are a Jew ! That’s how it works !… ~~~ ~~~ Marx practiced ‘Lutherism’ ? Don’t you mean; ‘LUCIFERianism’ ? Marx OPENLY wrote a lengthy ode to Satan ! This is verifiable for anyone with the inclination… ~~~ The ‘evil ideology’ you mention found it’s origin first in the Talmud… and was then refined in ‘The Protocols of the Elders of Zion’ (Google THAT !), and was the background ideology for all these men… ultimately – they just did what the Rothschilds wanted. The ‘how’ didn’t matter, just the end result… that being the destruction and financial conquest of first Christian Russia, then Christian Germany and the theft of the Holy Land… Now their focus is Christian North America !

  16. The Prodigal Son said

    Devon… ~~~ I just noticed that you accused me of having “dubious sources”, even though I had not providen any sources. I realized you were trying to ‘head me off at the pass’ – so to speak – so I thought I would provide you w/ more ! ~~~ You’re welcome !

  17. Devon said

    Honestly PS, you must be getting your material and sources from Stormfront or something akin to that…

    None of those people were Jews or Hebrews etc etc…absolute rubbish

  18. The Prodigal Son said

    Now again, you’re posting a rebuttal BEFORE I post anything ! All I did was quickly eat my supper… how do you reply so fast ? Anyway… ~~~ ~~~ … Roosevelt (formerly Rosenfelt) – The first Roosevelt came to America in 1649. His name was Claes Rosenfelt, and he was a ‘Jew’… Sara Delano was ALSO of Spanish/Jewish descent. ~~~ ~~~ Churchill (Jacobson) – Winston’s mother was Jenny Jerome. Her father was involved in theatre investment and had changed his name from Jacobson… “… Cunning, no doubt came to Churchill in the Jewish genes transmitted by his mother.” – Moshe Kohn – writing in the Jerusalem Post. ~~~ ~~~ (eh, Moshe ?)

  19. The Prodigal Son said

    Eisenhower (Eisenhauer)… The 1915 graduating class yearbook from West Point Military Academy provides a caption which identifies Eisenhower as a “…terrible Swedish Jew…”. Eisenhower himself had admitted the obvious upon entry to West Point. ~~~ ~~~ … Vladimir Lenin (Ilych Ulin) – His mother was a German Jewess named ‘Blank’ whose father had changed his name from Weiss. ~~~ ~~~ and finally, everyone’s favorite… Joseph Stalin (real name : Ioseph David Djugashvili – Kochba) – Djugashvili LITERALLY translates into ‘Jew’s son’ ! He was a descendant of Dinaric Jews, and had 3 Jewish wives. During his ‘revolutionary’ days, he changed his name to ‘Kochba’ – who was the historical leader of the Jews during one of the anti-Roman uprisings of the Jews… ~~~ ~~~ The main commonalities between these men were that they were Jews, and that they had changed their names to obscure that fact.

  20. The Prodigal Son said

    (Found this today :)… “I am strongly in favor of using poisoned gas against uncivilized tribes. The moral effect should be good… and it would spread a lively terror.”… – Winston Churchill… commenting on the British use of poison gas against the Iraqis after WWI.

  21. The Prodigal Son said

    ~~~ That was supposed to be a colon and an end parentheses… NOT a smiley face ! These matters are definitely nothing to smile about. ~~~ Apologies…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: