Jesus Christ Is Lord

That every knee should bow and every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord to the glory of God the Father!

Leading Charismatic J. Lee Grady Claiming That Sarah Palin Is A Prophet Chosen By God To Lead Christians Into Holy War!

Posted by Job on September 10, 2008

I know, I know, yet another political article. I promise to do better, but how can I ignore things like this? Brother PJ Miller tipped me off to this fromJ. Lee Gray, editor of the influential Charisma Magazine. Now similar to Christianity Today and Roman Catholics with evangelical Christians, Charisma Magazine should have been rejected by Pentecostals and charismatics once they started accepting oneness pentecostal anti – Trinitarian heretics among their midst. Here it is in black and white from J. Lee Grady’s pen:

2. Trinitarians must embrace our Oneness brothers. I know people in the Assemblies of God who were taught all their lives that the Jesus worshiped by Oneness Pentecostals is “another Jesus.” The Lord told us to love one another, but we have avoided this by declaring that our brothers aren’t really in the family.

So what excuse is there for calling Charisma Magazine anything but what it is, which is apostate? Even better:

It all sounds like pointless doctrinal hair-splitting to us younger types. After all, who can explain the mystery of God’s triune nature? Instead of fussing about terms or reducing the gospel to a baptismal formula, why can’t we rally around our common belief that the Father sent His Son to save the world?

Excuse me, but what vital Christian doctrine CANNOT that be said about? Creationism? It is too hard to understand. Baptism? It is too hard to obey. The incarnation? Can’t believe it. The resurrection? Can’t accept it. Salvation only through the cross? Can’t put up with it. Eternal damnation in the lake of fire for sinners? Can’t conceive it. Adulterers, liars, thieves, necromancers, occultists, homosexuals, and apostates in the pulpit? Judge not, touch not mine anointed and do my prophet no harm! Look, A FALSE GOSPEL CANNOT SAVE!

But enough of that digression. J. Lee Grady claims that Sarah Palin has the Deborah anointing. Now my position is that all of these various spirits that Pentecostals and charismatics speak of do not exist, as there is one Lord who has one spirit, the Holy Spirit. Also, the word “anointing” means “choosing”, when one is “anointed by God”, it means that a person was given a calling by God to a specific calling or ministry in service to the Lord and His people. So I would discourage Christians from going around saying that someone has “a David anointing” or “a Hezekiah anointing” or “Paul’s spirit”, but I will go ahead and say that it is a crude and possibly incorrect but still understandable way of saying that someone has the same office, calling, or task as another Christian.

On J. Lee Grady’s part, this is very problematic for two reasons. First, the Bible commands us to “lay hands quickly on no man.” That is 1 Timothy 5:22. Now the best context for this verse was the practice of the church laying hands on people when they choose officers for the church. Please recall that when Stephen the martyr and Philip, Procorus, Nicanor, Timon, Parmenas, and Nicolas were appointed as deacons in Acts 6:1-6. Verse 6 states that after the church selected them, the apostles laid hands on them after praying for them. Though laying hands on people was part of the ritual or process of actually choosing and placing people in the position of service, it became a shorthanded reference for the act of choosing and installing a person into Christian service itself. But please note Acts 6:1-6 and interpret it with 1 Timothy 5:16-25. In both cases, it is obvious that a person should not be laid hands upon, or chosen, or anointed, unless the person had demonstrated their worthiness for the position by their fruits: excellent reputations, spiritual maturity, strong knowledge of and adherence to the Word of God in the eyes of the local congregation.

Now unless Grady has some extensive past history with Sarah Palin that he for some reason chooses not to reveal in his column, he has NO BASIS for claiming under New Testament church standards that God has called this woman to leadership or anything else. If he has been in longtime Christian fellowship with Palin, he should have let us know this. Otherwise, we can presume that like 99.9% of America, he was so ignorant of this woman’s existence that he could not have picked her out of a lineup until now.

So claiming that Palin was appointed by God to anything is irresponsible, reckless, and dangerous because it causes Christians to presume that she is generally acting and leading according to God’s desires and even non – Christians that respect our faith to presume that she is basically honest and moral. Such claims also damage how Christians view church doctrines and practice. Talk like this hinders people from knowing that being called by God or even elected to service by the church MEANS SOMETHING. That there are STANDARDS that these people must adhere to in order to be eligible for their appointment (in the case of a deacon) and AFTER their appointment (in the case of church appointed deacons and God – called everything else). That people keep throwing around  “I have an anointing, he has an anointing, I feel a great anointing and move of the Holy Spirit in this place” with the same level of care and discernment as they would use to say “boy that was a mighty fine and tasty bowl of oatmeal” is a great reason why we allow anyone – especially if he is a Christian – do whatever they want with no accountability whatsoever. 

So what is Grady’s basis for alleging that Palin has a call on her life? Her politics. Her values. Her culture. Her family. Her actions as mayor and governor. And keep in mind: he knows NONE of these first hand! He only knows them by their reports from people who have a motive to portray Palin in the best possible light for worldly reasons, and of course Grady is ignoring all of  the people with opposing views of this woman’s performance and character. They’re just liberals who reject the Bible, right? Now if they were “Jesus Christ was born again in hell” Word of Faith teachers, “Jesus Christ was rich” prosperity doctrine teachers, or “God the Father suffered and died on the cross” United (oneness) Pentecostals, they’d be good credible people, right? 

This is replacing true Christianity, which is of the spirit, with a works – based religion of the flesh. Of the circumcision. And you know what? It is a very shallow one at that. Islam, Judaism, Hinduism … do you know what those religions require before a person is declared worthy, a lifetime process of rigorous spiritual, religious, and personal demands? Muslims according in particular to their belief system have no assurance of their salvation when they die (unless they perish in a holy war) no matter their dedication to Islam during their lives. But Grady – and those like him – are willing to say that just because we like what we KNOW of her church (its denomination is similar to mine), her culture (small town self – reliant Alaska outdoorsmen are more holy and sanctified than those inner city welfare mothers?), her lifestyle (a married mother of five is more holy than, you know, a married mother of two or a single mother of any amount?) and her political beliefs?

The last one is key. Because she shares my values, her daughter being pregnant out of wedlock is fine. It is covered by, you know, grace. But since Jamie Lynn Spears and her family does not share my values, it is horrible. No grace for you! And as for Obama, we can dismiss him by saying that if it was his daughter he would have forced her to have an abortion, convicting him in advance for something that he hasn’t even done yet and we have no idea whether he would! The opposite of grace for you! Never mind the fact that pro – abortion people who have unwanted pregnancies choose to have the baby all the time. Never mind the fact that pro – life people who have unwanted pregnancies have abortions all the time. (Studies assert that evangelicals have the same abortion rate as the national average, some claim that it is even higher.)

Now, THIS is where the 30 years of James Dobson Focus on the Family religious right mindset of conferring righteousness on people based on their lifestyles, cultures, affiliations, and political beliefs has gotten us. And we really are entering a sort of danger zone here. Where J. Lee Grady has generally not been one given to trying to influence politics, he goes and calls this woman God’s prophet. And Albert Mohler, usually a no – nonsense figure who also avoids religious right politics and is no supporter of Pentecostalism, has basically endorsed Palin, something that I can find no evidence whatsoever that he did for Mike Huckabee, a leader of his own denomination. If this is not Phariseeism as expressed in the political and cultural context, what is?

As I said of Grady, if Mohler has some pre – existing relationship with this woman that causes him to regard her as being worthy of his endorsement based largely on her being a Christian (or should I again say a Christian with the “right” cultural markers … where in the Bible does it say that shooting bears, eating mooseburgers, living in the frontier, and having 5 kids places you closer to the kingdom of heaven or is evidence of the inner workings of the fruits of the Holy Spirit?), then he should let us know. Otherwise, it is AT BEST reckless and irresponsible. At worst, it is showing much more respect than he ever would to even another professed Christian that came in different packaging. Would Grady and Mohler be as effusive over a Methodist from Chicago or Episcopal from Baltimore, especially if they were Democrats, even if they were right on the doctrinal issues and the political ones directly related to them (i.e. abortion and homosexuality)?You know the answer to that question and so do they. 

And that is just the first part. The second concern is not nearly as lengthy but even more important. Go back to the book of Judges, chapter 4 in particular for this “Deborah anointing” issue. What was the situation? The children of Israel were at war with an enemy that, oh well, could be compared to the Muslims of today without being too far off. What did God choose Deborah to be? His prophetess through whom He spoke His Word. Again, why did God raise up prophets and judges in those days? TO USE THEM TO LEAD ISRAEL IN BATTLE AGAINST THE ENEMY. And what happened? Though Barak was the judge and the leader of the army, THE COMMANDER IN CHIEF, he would not go into battle against the ancestors of today’s MUSLIMS, in particular THE PALESTINIANS, without God’s prophetess Deborah on the battlefield leading him. Why? Because though Barak had been called by God to lead the army, because of his weak character and faith he was unwilling to do so without a woman of stronger character and faith at his side.

So here we are in America in a war against terror against a Muslim ideology. And – if their electoral hopes and dreams are fulfilled as I think they will be – the commander in chief will be another Barak, a man who professes Christian faith (raised Episcopal but now Southern Baptist evangelical) but does not wear it on his sleeve in the appropriate manner or keep company with the right and proper powerbrokers in the evangelical world (as a matter of fact Palin is his third try at short circuit people like Dobson and also the more Baptist – oriented evangelicals for lesser known Pentecostal figures like John Hagee and Rod Parsley) and is not sufficiently socially conservative in his beliefs.

So where Barak fell short in his true faith, McCain similarly falls short in this new universalist pluralist ecumenical dual covenant (or truthfully many covenant!) works based religion that serves the aims of the religious right. Again, never forget that the preferred candidate of most of this crowd was Mormon Mitt Romney, who fit their “culture and views” requirements precisely and the fellow’s actual religious doctrines (as well as his basic honesty and integrity or more accurately his complete lack thereof) was of no consequence. (Extending this a bit, this also explains J. Lee Grady’s embrace of oneness pentecostal heretics, whose beliefs are totally wrong, but who nonetheless have been a part of the Pentecostal religious scene since 1916, are growing in prominence and influence especially in music and with famous preachers/televangelists and their many theologians in Pentecostal seminaries and Bible colleges, so they must be accepted.)

So the morally flawed less than faithful Barak – McCain needs the pure and faithful prophetess Deborah – Palin at his side to fight the Lord’s battle and win against the Philistines – Muslims. (Please note: correlating Philistines and Muslims is not so coincidental when you consider that the term Palestine, or PALESTINIAN, is what the Roman Empire came up with to denote the Philistines, and they named Israel Palestine after their ancient enemies to spite and mock the Jews.)

I suppose that in this imagination, their first Muslim conquest will be on election day against Barack HUSSEIN “McCain has not made in issue of my Muslim faith/I still remember the Muslim call to prayer at my madrassa, one of the most beautiful sounds in the world” Obama. That is fine. What then? Will the prophetess Deborah – Palin tell Barak – McCain to put every Muslim in Iraq, Iran, Indonesia, Somalia, Chechnya, Turkey, Kosovo, Kenya, PALESTINE, etc. to death with the sword? Or more accurately WITH NUCLEAR WEAPONS? I don’t know Mr. Grady, that sounds more like McCain anti – Christ Palin false prophet to me! (So you folks thinking that Obama is the anti – Christ may have the right time but the wrong candidate!) Maybe your interpretation of scripture is different. Then again, it would have to be for you to claim that we are brothers with people who blatantly deny scripture by rejecting Trinity, not to mention those who preach the false prosperity and Word of Faith doctrines.

You might say that Grady did not have a militaristic – eschatological intent in calling Palin “Deborah”, that he was only looking for a woman in a leadership position. First of all, even if that were the case, the guy is still wrong. Do you know why? Because words mean things. Especially words from the Bible. We can’t just go around throwing Bible terms and references around because they sound nice, make us feel good, and help us advance or win arguments (or elections). God raised up Deborah to a specific office to perform a specific task. Claiming that a woman that is being appointed to run a college or a bank or even a church ministry is bad enough because of the context. But saying the same of a woman who actually would be the advisor to a commander in chief to a nation that is at war is making a direct parallel between McCain and Palin and the actual Barak and Deborah of the Bible that cannot be ignored!

Also, this paragraph by J. Lee Grady proves that he is not merely applying a Biblical female leadership analogy, even in poor context:

When McCain announced that he had chosen Palin as his running mate, I was reminded of the biblical story of Deborah, the Old Testament prophet who rallied God’s people to victory at a time when ancient Israel was being terrorized by foreign invaders. Deborah’s gender didn’t stop her from amassing an army; she inspired the people in a way no man could. She and her defense minister, Barak, headed to the front lines and watched God do a miracle on the battlefield. In her song in Judges 5:7, Deborah declares: “The peasantry ceased, they ceased in Israel, until I, Deborah, arose, until I arose, a mother in Israel” (NASB). Sometimes it takes a true mother to rally the troops.

Seriously, what else am I supposed to think when I read something like that? So in less than 30 years Christians have gone from cheering when Ronald Reagan largely endorsed the claims of Mormon founder Joseph Smith in declaring America to be New Jerusalem in his “we are the shining city on a hill” speech (which basically gave salvation to all who earned it by agreeing with Reagan culturally and politically, and condemned all dissenters to the lake of fire … hey didn’t Palin’s pastor do largely the same in alluding that Bush critics and Kerry voters are going to the lake of fire?) to claiming that God will use Palin to raise up his army? 

This is where the religious right and the false doctrines surrounding it is taking Christanity, people. (The religious left is no better, so don’t even try it.) If you wish to make your calling and election in Jesus Christ sure, you had best repent yourself of it and love the next world and not this one.

10 Responses to “Leading Charismatic J. Lee Grady Claiming That Sarah Palin Is A Prophet Chosen By God To Lead Christians Into Holy War!”

  1. naturalsystah said

    Just when I thought that J Lee Grady couldn’t say anything worse than stuff he’s espoused before!

    What a mess.

  2. Job said

    Naturalsystah:

    I am of the opinion that it is going to get a lot worse at a very fast rate. The comments from some of these people are disturbing.

  3. We must hold on to the end and continue to shout aloud to those who are going the wrong way. God help us.

  4. jennifer said

    You know what? I am refreshed when I leave here. I have felt as of late that I am walking around in the twilight zone. So many professing Christians justifying everything they do. I see why to vote as a Christian, why not to, and why I am a fool. What I wish is for Christians to stand in the faith.

    Thanks for taking the time to share these things.
    Jennifer

  5. Reformed1 said

    Just a little note to let you know that I think “brother PJ Miller” is actually sister PJ Miller.

  6. Kyle said

    J Lee Grady is the same guy who defended Todd Bentley and accused us blogers as being wrong to question this heretic.

    Kyle

  7. kenmoksa said

    “I was reminded of the Biblical story . . .” AND “. . . claims that SP is . . .” are two different concepts (as I read English). I don’t know Lee Grady, nor the person who wrote this Blog, but I can surmise that the author of this Blog has a giant-sized ax to grind against Mr. Grady. I found no “claim” in the article I read, but only an alusion to a possible parallel. But I guess that was enough to goad the author into writing a tome to blast Mr. Grady. If Mr. Grady has some heretical views of orthodoxy, they must have been expressed elsewhere, ‘cuz they’re not found in this article. But it’s pretty obvious that the author of this critique has some pretty uncharitable feelings against Mr. Grady – for they were abundant throughout his comments. “And they’ll know we are Christians by our critical attitudes and caustic pens.” I do not mean this response as burning sarcasm, but only as a gentle rebuke. When one writes, remember that your audience may not have been present for all the nasty things you’ve already exposed about this “heretic.” Thus, we may only have before us the article you critiqued – and in this case, your criticism does not follow. It only makes you look like an irrational mad man instead of the discerner of spirits you apparently think you are.

  8. Rusty said

    Motherhood is the ultimate profession.
    It is a sacred duty assigned to women by our Creator. To fail at it is to fail HIM.

    Where is the outrage by women and Christians particularly at a women who leaves a challenged child in the hands of others while she goes off to save the world? That is why we spay and neuter our pets… to keep from forcing others to take care of the offspring.

    Why be pro-life if you are not pro-family?

    http://hannahruth.wordpress.com/

  9. Job said

    Rusty:

    I am pro-life and pro-family, but I am pro – Jesus Christ as revealed to us by the Bible first. A real problem that I see is people taking pro-life and pro-family to be pro – Jesus Christ and pro-Bible by default. They think that so long as they are pro-life, pro-family, pro-values, etc. then they are Christian by default. Therefore, they believe that they don’t have to read God’s Word, or if they do they only have to read it devotionally or ritualistically instead of trying to meditate and discover its meaning in their lives. Most honestly are willing to allow others to interpret and apply the Bible for them, and not just their own pastor in a local church, but literally people they see on TV or listen to on the radio or read in some magazine … people that they have no relationship with, know nothing about, and in many cases are not even clergy!

    The truth is that plenty of people with great family lives are unsaved. By contrast, plenty of Christians have very troubled family lives. Take Jesus Christ. Conceived out of wedlock, never married Himself, scripture records that He and His brothers and at times He and His mother were under conflict during His ministry. Take His apostles. How many were married or had children? Going back to the Old Testament, look at Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, David, Job, etc. and all of the family troubles that they had. That is why the evangelical church’s reaction to the culture wars in the 1960s and 1970s by focusing on “family values” is so wrong. Even the motivation is wrong … it was a clear cultural warfare tactic to say “Hey, those freaks out on the street marching or those weirdos living downtown or in the inner city … they are bad people! It is the white middle class suburbanites TRYING TO RAISE A FAMILY that are the good people that make this country great! And because we are the ones that make this country great, WE ARE THE ONES THAT SHOULD HAVE POLITICAL, ECONOMIC, AND CULTURAL POWER VESTED IN US! We are the ones who should be running this country, not those DIRTY PEOPLE!”

    While I of course am not going to defend the street protests or the alternative lifestyle folks, the “family values” folks were just as wrong. They weren’t practicing spiritual warfare in the Name of Jesus Christ, but cultural warfare in the name of politics, economics, and earthly power. Spiritual warfare would have been going to those urban and downtown areas that they had abandoned for the suburbs decades ago as part of “white flight” and handing out some gospel tracts, or maybe mentoring an at – risk child.

    Yes, I said “at – risk child.” That is the primary reason why this “pro-family” stuff is so wrong. It is a class and culture argument, not a Christian one. It is relevant only for middle and upper class westerners. If you are in the underclass or if you live outside the west, both spouses have to work. Even if it is “technically” at home in many places, it is still very hard and time consuming agricultural labor, much harder than what 99.9% of these professional women do in any office. So is the woman who has to take a job to help her husband put food on the table because gas is $4.50 a gallon and a box of cereal is $5.00 a bad mother? People like that need help, and their kids need our help. Our churches need to have more daycare, afterschool, and other programs for their kids at minimum. We need to have more pantries, more clothing drives, etc. for the working poor, and to convince them that they don’t need to be ashamed to take the help. These suburban “family values” megachurches will never step up and do this because they preach the false gospel of neoconservatism, claiming “people need to learn to stand on their own two feet” and “even if you start out working minimum wage or being underemployed, if you work hard enough you will work your way up the ladder and be middle class!” Please. Anyone who spent five minutes dealing with the working poor in this country knows that it is a lie. These people work hard all their lives, generally die either broke or in debt, and pass nothing on to their children.

    So, I cannot criticize Sarah Palin for working outside the home, because I would have to criticize low income women, including women whose husbands have died, women whose husbands have left them, women whose husbands ARE IN IRAQ, for doing the same. Instead of promoting a human ideal of motherhood, which the vast majority of women in the world cannot attain (not only for class reasons but the fact that, hey, not all women can have kids!) I promote the ideal of Jesus Christ.

  10. […] while the usual interpretation is benign, in the context of this Obama Messiah stuff (and Sarah Palin is a prophet) climate, things like this continue to creep me out. Possibly related posts: (automatically […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: