Jesus Christ Is Lord

That every knee should bow and every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord to the glory of God the Father!

More Proof That Evolution Is Inherently Racist: Nobel Prize Winner James Watson

Posted by Job on October 17, 2007

Original link here. Will the liberal anti – Christ media cover this, especially from this angle? Probably not.

Now here is what the Bible says: Genesis 1:26-27And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.” Colossians 3:11Where there is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision, Barbarian, Scythian, bond nor free: but Christ is all, and in all.” Galatians 3:28 – “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.” Philemon 10,15-17 – “I beseech thee for [runaway slave from his master] my son Onesimus, whom I have begotten in my bonds: For perhaps he therefore departed for a season, that thou shouldest receive him for ever; Not now as [your slave] a servant, but above [your slave] a servant, a brother beloved, specially to me, but how much more unto thee, both in the flesh, and in the Lord? If thou count me therefore a partner, receive [your slave] him as myself.”

Now as you see, Christianity and the Bible are clearly racist. They are incontrovertibly the source of African slavery, the subjugation of the Native Americans, discrimination, segregation, and all racial evil. It is incumbent upon us that we discard the evil of the Bible and the Christianity that arises from it so that we can rid ourselves of racial conflict and enter a new area of peace, tolerance, cooperation, mutual respect, and toleration between the races. Here is a clear example of what the secular humanist and naturalist mindset that comes from rejecting the Bible and embracing reason and rationalism in its place leads to, and how it can result in our racism – free tomorrow.

One of the world’s most eminent scientists was embroiled in an extraordinary row last night after he claimed that black people were less intelligent than white people and the idea that “equal powers of reason” were shared across racial groups was a delusion.

James Watson, a Nobel Prize winner for his part in the unravelling of DNA who now runs one of America’s leading scientific research institutions … reopened the explosive debate about race and science in a newspaper interview in which he said Western policies … were wrongly based on an assumption that black people were as clever as their white counterparts when “testing” suggested the contrary. He claimed genes responsible for creating differences in human intelligence could be found within a decade.”

Dr Watson told The Sunday Times that he was “inherently gloomy … because “all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours – whereas all the testing says not really“. He said there was a natural desire that all human beings should be equal but “people who have to deal with black employees find this not true.”

His views are also reflected in a book published next week, in which he writes: “There is no firm reason to anticipate that the intellectual capacities of peoples geographically separated in their evolution should prove to have evolved identically. Our wanting to reserve equal powers of reason as some universal heritage of humanity will not be enough to make it so.””

The furore echoes the controversy created in the 1990s by The Bell Curve, a book co-authored by the American political scientist Charles Murray, which suggested differences in IQ were genetic and discussed the implications of a racial divide in intelligence. The work was heavily criticised across the world, in particular by leading scientists who described it as a work of ” scientific racism”. ” (What the furor left out by the media was that Charles Murray and Richard Hernstein, who wrote The Bell Curve, were atheist/agnostic. They also do not like to point out that “scientific racism” was practiced by the Nazis. It was their defense at the Nuremberg trials. Instead, they contrive that the Nazis, whose swastika was a pre – Christian European pagan symbol representing the sun god and their leader specifically rejecting the deity, resurrection, and virgin birth of Jesus Christ in his writings, as a Christian movement.).

Critics of Dr Watson said there should be a robust response to his views across the spheres of politics and science.” But not religion oddly, because they hate Jesus Christ more than they hate racism. “These comments serve as a reminder of the attitudes which can still exists at the highest professional levels.” Yes, they do prove that attitudes in rebellion against Jesus Christ and the Bible exist at the highest professional levels.

He shared the 1962 Nobel Prize for medicine with his British colleague Francis Crick and New Zealand-born Maurice Wilkins.” Al Gore won a Nobel Prize. So did Yasir Arafat. Hmmm …

He has also suggested a link between skin colour and sex drive, positing the theory that black people have higher libidos, and argued in favour of genetic screening and engineering on the basis that ” stupidity” could one day be cured.” Wasn’t that precisely what the Nazis were doing in creating their race?

This is the best part.

Steven Rose, a professor of biological sciences at the Open University and a founder member of the Society for Social Responsibility in Science, said: ” This is Watson at his most scandalous. He has said similar things about women before but I have never heard him get into this racist terrain. If he knew the literature in the subject he would know he was out of his depth scientifically, quite apart from socially and politically.”

Anti-racism campaigners called for Dr Watson’s remarks to be looked at in the context of racial hatred laws. A spokesman for the 1990 Trust, a black human rights group, said: “It is astonishing that a man of such distinction should make comments that seem to perpetuate racism in this way.”” It is astonishing to YOU because you have been taught that racism is a product of Christianity. In your fanatical zeal to oppose Christianity, you have systematically suppressed and ignored all of the things that prove that evolution is inherently racist, including the title of Charles Darwin’s book “On the origin of species by means of natural selection or the preservation of favored races in the struggle for life“.

Want some more? “The human race has evolved to its present state of intelligence and power because of “the preservation of favored races in the struggle for life.”* “Race”* is the central mechanism of evolution that has created all living things. “The preservation of favored races”* is a simple process to understand, but its effects over time are awesome. If we examine the process, we find that at some stage in evolution we can observe a group of individuals of a single species which exists in an area segregated from other members of that same species. As a result of chance mutation, there occur genetic variations in some members of that segregated group. As the generations continue to reproduce, these genetic variations accumulate in the progeny of that segregate group. At first, the accumulated genetic variations do not make the segregate group different enough from the original species to justify calling the segregated group a new species or even a new “favored race”* of the original species. However, after many generations, the segregated group or tribe which had accumulated sufficient genetic differences would be called a new “race”* of the original species. Over time, these newly developed segregated races continue to accumulate genetic differences through chance mutation, variation, etc. The “favored”* variations increase the survivability of the “race”* which carries them. Once this new “favored race”* has become different enough from the original species, it is called a new species. Hence the subtitle, “On the origin of species by means of natural selection or the preservation of favored races in the struggle for life.”*There is really no probability that the “races”* would be equal. In fact, the whole notion runs counter to all evolutionary theory and to the whole science of biology.

Given the laws of biology, it would be a great surprise if the average strength or intelligence of one “race”* was found to be exactly equal to the average strength or intelligence of a different “race”*. Despite the controversy surrounding “race”*, it is not particularly useful to know which “race”* happens, as a result of an accident of evolutionary development, to have greater average strength or greater average intelligence because one could not predict from this average that any particular individual member of one “race”* was going to be superior or inferior to any particular individual member of a different “race”*. There are superior and inferior, strong and weak, intelligent and intelligent individuals in all “races”*. Regardless of “racial”* averages, one would still have to judge each individual on the basis of individual merit without reference to the average of the group to which he happened to belong. Only by judging people as individuals, could we avoid injustice and enable all people to make the maximum contribution to society. There is not such thing as a superior “race”* per se, in the sense that every member of one “race”* is superior to every member of another “race”*. Neither is there such a thing as “racial”* equality in the sense that the average strength or intelligence of one “race”* is equal to the average strength or intelligence of every other “race”*. By judging people as individuals, one could perhaps identify a (superior) socio-biological class which might be a cross section of all “races”* although probably not in equal proportion. The only way you could have a (superior race) would be if a “favored race”* evolved into and became the next more highly evolved species above Homo-Sapiens, in which case it would become a superior species. Eugenics is a moral commitment not a racial affiliation and any “race” that adopted a eugenic program could, given sufficient time, evolve into and become the next more highly evolved species above Homo-Sapiens. It is our hope that all “races” will accept that moral responsibility and accomplish that objective, but it can not be accomplished within the political, philosophical and religious milieu of the 20th century.”

Somehow, they left that out in school didn’t they? By the way, has anyone ever asked Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, Christopher Hitchens, and similar what they think of black people? Of course not.

Right now, I am offering you the opportunity to reject the racism of evolution and everything else that rejects and exalts itself against the knowledge of God, and to accept Yeshua HaMashiach, also known as Jesus Christ, as your personal Savior. Please realize that had Jesus Christ been alive in Germany in the 1940s, evolutionist Adolph Hitler would have put him in his gas chambers. And since the genealogy of Jesus Christ included some people that might have been of African extraction, evolutionist Margaret Sanger, founder of federally Planned Parenthood thanks to the rejecter of God and the Bible in favor of universalism George W. Bush, would have lobbied for Yeshua HaMashiach to be aborted, or for Miriam (Mary) to have been her uterus disabled to prevent her conception. Please reject the evil of racism and choose the love of Jesus Christ today. Follow The Three Step Salvation Plan!

Advertisements

6 Responses to “More Proof That Evolution Is Inherently Racist: Nobel Prize Winner James Watson”

  1. rsfeller said

    He has recanted that statement for whatever reason.

    Just because we don’t like something doesn’t make it not true. Racism sucks but if there is scientific evidence (which I’m not aware of any) to back different intellect values based on genetics then it could be true. This is just a un-PC theory that could be true for all we know, but sometimes the truth hurts.

    As far as all the other atheists you assume believe this too, you are being a hypocrite. You are pointing a finger at those who don’t agree with you that is just ugly as the statements they make.

    Your god is just one of a thousand man has dreamed up for whatever personal and political reasons. Don’t waste your life hating, disagreeing and obsession about one theory that most think is crazy. Life is to short. If there was a all knowing god why would he care if we obsess and care if we believe and/or need to pray? Why would an all powerful and omnipotent being need to give us commandments on how to live, he created us and can dictate our good and evil.

    god may turn out to be read but most likely we’ll never know. The bible is most likly a book of lies that has made people such as yourself hate and lie to make others conform to your ideals. You make a reference to Hitler…most likly those like you and the current mega-fundi-neocons are just as evil as Hitler, they just havent’ killed 6 million jews, yet.

  2. rsfeller: “Racism sucks but if there is scientific evidence (which I’m not aware of any) to back different intellect values based on genetics then it could be true. This is just a un-PC theory that could be true for all we know, but sometimes the truth hurts.”

    “Your god is just one of a thousand man has dreamed up for whatever personal and political reasons.”

    “The bible is most likly a book of lies that has made people such as yourself hate and lie to make others conform to your ideals.”

    “You make a reference to Hitler…most likly those like you and the current mega-fundi-neocons are just as evil as Hitler, they just havent’ killed 6 million jews, yet.”

    And you want for me to give up my beliefs to assume yours? Based on what? Your example? Pardon me if I refuse. Further, it is not my fault if you choose to reject history. Darwin’s book and theory were conceived in and motivated by racism. Hitler adopted that racism and used it to justify killing 6 million Jews. If you cannot handle that truth, and instead hide behind “well if science justifies racism then it must be true” (essentially Hitler’s position) then that is your problem, not mine. By the way, I am not a neocon, and I oppose the Iraq War. You just presume that because I am a fundamentalist Christian that I am a neocon Bush supporter? Well that makes you even more the bigot. Furthermore, Bush isn’t even a Christian. The fellow has been going around spouting anti – Christian universalism ever since he got in office. None of his policies are compatible with Christianity or the Bible, especially the war in Iraq. You are so blinded by your own biases against Christianity that you refuse to acknowledge it.

  3. johnkaniecki said

    Rsfeller,

    It is the first time I have seen your name and I certainly would like to welcome you to this blog. I am so happy that someone with different views has joined us so we can discuss matters in an intellegent and civilized manner.

    No Jesus wasn’t like a thousand other gods dreamed up and let me explain for you why.

    First of all you cannot deny the historical existance of Jesus as a person. If you do so I could reference you to many books that prove he existed. Suffice it to say denying Jesus would be more ridiculous than denying the existance or Alexander the Great. (I use this example because of the literture I read and the examination of this paritcular figure.) But
    you could submit any historical contemporary into the latter spot.

    Now if you admit that Jesus was a person than you must examine the claims that he made. I have of course haven’t read all the literature of the thousand gods you claim that mankind has made up. Nor I doubt have you. However I will testify that the Bible is a book unlike any other book that exists. I have read parts of the Koran, the Book of Mormon, budhist material, Hare Krishna material, Greek mythology, Roman mythology and Egyptian mythology and others. In all those that I have named it didn’t take to long for me to realize that what I was reading wasn’t divine.

    I would be curious about the specifics of the lies that exist in the Bible that you mention. Have you ever read the whole Bible? I don’t mean to insult you but many so called “Christians” have never even picked up the book at all.

    By the way to answer your question the all knowing God cares that we believe because, among other things, His teachings tell us the best way that we should live. He loves us and thus wants us to follow His ways so we can exist in a non destructive, blessed, happy, peaceful, caring society. He cares that we pray because as a Father he delights that His children talk to Him, much in the way Earthly parents like to converse with their children.

    God could have made us into robots with no choices. Instead He created us with an independent will. We can make decisions. We make thousands of decisions each day. Yes God influences our decisions but he does not control our every act. That is far from the truth. I’m fairly sure your experiences on Earth and using your brain has taught you that you are not compelled to act one way or the other. Some forms of astrology for example denies that we have choices and I reject that notion.

    Yet just like you, God can speak and act freely so can God do as He chooses. God does predestine some to salvation. I like to think of this as a clay object being formed. Sometimes the clay object will hold water and sometimes it won’t. Yet we are all clay in the Potter’s hands and we don’t know which one will hold water. (Though there are signs, known as fruits of the Spirit which are a good indication of whether one is a Child of God.) So while you obviously are an unbeliever I have no way to tell what tomorrow will bring for you. In this I have hope and pray that you will come to know the great Love of God as I understand it.

    I could quote many scriptures to back these words but that may be getting ahead of things.

    Love,

    John

  4. Dee said

    Hitler would have gassed Jesus because he was a Jew, not because he was the son of God. End of story.

    As for racism, I am reminded of the following, stated by state judge Leon Bazile when sentencing Richard and Mildred Loving for the crime of violating Virginia’s miscegenation statute in 1959:

    “Almighty God created the races white, black, yellow, Malay and red, and he placed them on separate continents. And but for the interference with his arrangement there would be no cause for such marriages. The fact that he separated the races shows that he did not intend for the races to mix.”

    –From US Supreme Court case Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967)

    Please do NOT tell me that Christianity as practiced in the USA doesn’t have some elements of racism in it. It does. Obviously Judge Bazile got his statement from somewhere, probably from Sunday School and hearing sermons all his life about the superiority of the white race. Even today, it’s still said that the most segregated hour in the US is 11:00 a.m. on Sunday. Need I go on?

    Racism is a terrible stain upon Christianity, one that has not been erased, and one that cannot be easily swept under the rug. As for your slights against liberal blogdom, if you did any searching around, you’d see that Watson was roundly criticized all over the place.

  5. Dee:

    My point was never that a great many Christians are racist. My point is that unlike evolution, racism is not inherent to Christianity. Christian racists abuse the religion to justify their beliefs. But racism and eugenics are so much inherently a part of Darwinism that people like you will not even speak of the full name of Darwin’s book, let alone the contents in it or the intent of it.

  6. Kyle said

    There is no such thing as race(In terms of genetics). It was created by man. Only when we are together with the Lord will all this nonsense come to an end.

    Kyle

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: