The “Holy” Bible: Cat – Lovers Translation
Posted by Job on December 19, 2007
LA Times: New Translation of the Bible in “Cat-Speak”
Another Slice of Laodicea nugget: The L.A. Times reports on a new Bible version done in Cat-lover language. Please see my post on the absence of the fear of God in our times. When I think of treating Holy Scripture this way, I tremble. Not these people.
Here is an example: “OH my, they oppended nuther sealz there wuz big ground shaky. Teh sunz got all darky and teh moonz wuz bluudy.” (Revelation 6)
See what happens when we lose the fear of the Lord people? Then again one cannot lose what they never really had. See A College Instructor on the Fear of the Lord and The Fear of God: A Forgotten Doctrine from the same blogger. Please recall that Book of Acts in the New Testament called a group of people that made up a large percentage of the first Gentile Christians “god – fearers.” I now await the “touch not mine anointed and do my prophet no harm” crowd of Paula White/Juanita Bynum/TD Jakes/John Hagee/BennyHinn/Rick Warren lovers to come defend the logical conclusion of their own apostasy.
Eden Hadassah said
I wonder if these people who actually buy this stuff also say they “meow” in the spirit?
Paul Wilber’s wife did! Meow in the spirit…that is.
Job said
Eden Hadassah:
Oh, well, you are taking this conversation down another path …
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4627856748432211034
Eden Hadassah said
Well that’s what being “possessed” is all about! Where are all the Priests?
Isn’t that amazing? And these are the people that talk about “demonology” the most! They should know.
On a different note, thought you would like the latest article on Ron Paul…now they have deemed him a “racist.” It is so stupid! Anything to try and smear him. It didn’t work if you read the comments on this article:
http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/news/politics/blog/2007/12/ron_pauls_thoughtprovoking_cho.html
Job said
Eden Hadassah:
Unfortunately, it looks like our brother in Christ Jesus IC has something legitimate on my man Ron Paul:
http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/12/19/ron_paul_on_homosexuals/
It is bad, really bad.
Eden Hadassah said
Hi Job,
I just listened to the audio, and I am sorry to say that I would still support him.
Sexual sin is sexual sin, regardless hetero-or-homosexual in nature. The depravity of both kinds is disturbing. I see adultery, prostitution and homosexuality just as grievous and degrading to others as other sins.
And the whole topic of gays in the military is wierd! I mean, come on… if you are a straight man or woman, you are of greater “moral character” than a gay man? Why? So we can ruin that “moral character” by having them kill another human?
That’s just me though.
He is still the best dude for the job.
Job said
Eden Hadassah:
The problem with me is that he refused to confess what scripture says about the topic, and that he strongly hinted that his medical knowledge on the issue trumped that of the Bible. (I do agree that the gays in the military thing is a sham, what about gays in the pulpit and in the home?) I agree that he is the best of a very flawed bunch of candidates. But unless he stops trying to deny the Bible, the best might not be good enough.
Eden Hadassah said
That’s why I don’t vote!
But I like the fact that I have the option. If Ron Paul was sterling on every issue, I still couldn’t. It is a personal conviction for me that the Lord has put on my heart. But I can say who I would vote.
I definately don’t like Duncan Hunter. (sorry IC) He sits wrong with me with out him even saying a word! And it isn’t his looks or personality, other wise if it was, Ron Paul would be in that category too.